Skip to content

utilize updated values from settings config #8882

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

hlshen
Copy link
Contributor

@hlshen hlshen commented Jul 22, 2025

Ensure every usage of a settings flag gets the most recent value.

Verified that importPath is set in subsequent start emulator execution.
Screenshot 2025-07-22 at 12 34 42 PM

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @hlshen, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on improving the reliability of configuration access throughout the application. By modifying how settings are retrieved, the system now guarantees that every usage of a configuration flag reflects its most recent value, preventing potential issues arising from stale or outdated settings.

Highlights

  • Settings Management: I've refactored the codebase to eliminate the practice of caching the return value of getSettings() in local variables. Instead, getSettings() is now called directly at the point of use, ensuring that all operations consistently retrieve the most current configuration values.
  • Code Readability and Maintainability: This change removes numerous redundant settings variable declarations across multiple files, leading to more concise and readable code by reducing unnecessary intermediate variables.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

The pull request updates the code to utilize the most recent values from the settings configuration. The changes involve replacing direct calls to the settings object with calls to the getSettings() method at the point of use. This ensures that the most up-to-date settings are always used. However, this approach introduces performance regressions by calling getSettings() multiple times within the same function. The review suggests caching the settings within the scope of the function to avoid redundant calls and improve performance.

@@ -42,8 +41,7 @@
command: string,
presentationOptions: vscode.TaskPresentationOptions = { focus: true },
): Promise<string> {
const settings = getSettings();
setTerminalEnvVars(settings.extraEnv ?? {});
setTerminalEnvVars(getSettings().extraEnv ?? {});
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

high

Similar to runCommand, the previous implementation of runTerminalTask was more efficient. This change introduces a performance regression by calling getSettings() twice (here and on line 67). Please cache the result of getSettings() in a local variable at the top of the function.

export function runTerminalTask(
  taskName: string,
  command: string,
  presentationOptions: vscode.TaskPresentationOptions = { focus: true },
): Promise<string> {
  const settings = getSettings();
  setTerminalEnvVars(settings.extraEnv ?? {});

).then(() => {
checkLogin();
});
});

const startEmulatorsTask = () => {
analyticsLogger.logger.logUsage(DATA_CONNECT_EVENT_NAME.START_EMULATORS);

const settings = getSettings();
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

It's redundant to call getSettings() again here, since it's already called on line 91. You can remove this call and use the settings variable that's already defined.

    let cmd = `${settings.firebasePath} emulators:start --project ${currentProjectId.value}`;

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants